<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dracula, the Novel, Initial Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lestersmith.com/2008/12/12/dracula-the-novel-initial-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lestersmith.com/2008/12/12/dracula-the-novel-initial-thoughts/</link>
	<description>A convergence of poetry, game design, and Web tech.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:03:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Twilight better than Dracula? &#124; The Hungry Dead</title>
		<link>http://lestersmith.com/2008/12/12/dracula-the-novel-initial-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Twilight better than Dracula? &#124; The Hungry Dead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lestersmith.com/?p=197#comment-312</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;d ask that you read my various posts (1, 2, &amp; 3) about the experience of rereading Dracula recently. They lay out what I see as both [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;d ask that you read my various posts (1, 2, &amp; 3) about the experience of rereading Dracula recently. They lay out what I see as both [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Alliterates &#187; Is Twilight better than Dracula?</title>
		<link>http://lestersmith.com/2008/12/12/dracula-the-novel-initial-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>The Alliterates &#187; Is Twilight better than Dracula?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lestersmith.com/?p=197#comment-311</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;d ask that you read my various posts (1, 2, &amp; 3) about the experience of rereading Dracula recently. They lay out what I see as both [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;d ask that you read my various posts (1, 2, &amp; 3) about the experience of rereading Dracula recently. They lay out what I see as both [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Twilight better than Dracula? &#171; LesterSmith.com</title>
		<link>http://lestersmith.com/2008/12/12/dracula-the-novel-initial-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Twilight better than Dracula? &#171; LesterSmith.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lestersmith.com/?p=197#comment-307</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;d ask that you read my various posts (1, 2, &amp; 3) about the experience of rereading Dracula recently. They lay out what I see as both [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;d ask that you read my various posts (1, 2, &amp; 3) about the experience of rereading Dracula recently. They lay out what I see as both [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lester</title>
		<link>http://lestersmith.com/2008/12/12/dracula-the-novel-initial-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lestersmith.com/?p=197#comment-112</guid>
		<description>I understand your point, Matt. However, as you know, I read quite a bit of 19th-century literature, and while it all demonstrates a more relaxed pace, there&#039;s an &lt;em&gt;uneveness&lt;/em&gt; to Stoker&#039;s work that I think shows a lack of final polish. Where &lt;em&gt;Dracula&lt;/em&gt; is good, it&#039;s &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; good; but that isn&#039;t the case throughout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand your point, Matt. However, as you know, I read quite a bit of 19th-century literature, and while it all demonstrates a more relaxed pace, there&#8217;s an <em>uneveness</em> to Stoker&#8217;s work that I think shows a lack of final polish. Where <em>Dracula</em> is good, it&#8217;s <em>really</em> good; but that isn&#8217;t the case throughout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Forbeck</title>
		<link>http://lestersmith.com/2008/12/12/dracula-the-novel-initial-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Forbeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lestersmith.com/?p=197#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Some of the dragging parts may also have to do with the many decades that separate Stoker from the modern reader. Still, most of the book holds up amazingly well even in 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the dragging parts may also have to do with the many decades that separate Stoker from the modern reader. Still, most of the book holds up amazingly well even in 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
