<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Boldly Go, Where People Can&#8217;t Shut It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lestersmith.com/2009/05/25/to-boldly-go-where-people-cant-shut-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lestersmith.com/2009/05/25/to-boldly-go-where-people-cant-shut-it/</link>
	<description>A convergence of poetry, game design, and Web tech.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 08:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lester</title>
		<link>http://lestersmith.com/2009/05/25/to-boldly-go-where-people-cant-shut-it/comment-page-1/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 04:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lestersmith.com/?p=854#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Oh, if only Ann Richards would start a Drafthouse up here. . . . 

Yes, &lt;i&gt;Wrath of Kahn&lt;/i&gt; was good, for its time. And I can&#039;t really argue with the truism that the even-numbered ones are the good ones. 

Not that any of the Next-Gen-based films were anything but forgettable. 

I&#039;m sorry you didn&#039;t like the new &lt;i&gt;Star Trek.&lt;/i&gt; It certainly pushed all the right buttons for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, if only Ann Richards would start a Drafthouse up here. . . . </p>
<p>Yes, <i>Wrath of Kahn</i> was good, for its time. And I can&#8217;t really argue with the truism that the even-numbered ones are the good ones. </p>
<p>Not that any of the Next-Gen-based films were anything but forgettable. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry you didn&#8217;t like the new <i>Star Trek.</i> It certainly pushed all the right buttons for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Maggi</title>
		<link>http://lestersmith.com/2009/05/25/to-boldly-go-where-people-cant-shut-it/comment-page-1/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Maggi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lestersmith.com/?p=854#comment-424</guid>
		<description>Lester,

Amen to magpies! You should come to Austin, sit through a movie at Alamo Drafthouse which is for diehards. When it&#039;s a big-deal movie such as Star Trek or Watchmen, they show a little comical warning that ends with a message: &quot;Don&#039;t talk during the movie or we&#039;ll throw your ass out!&quot;

A favorite of mine is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUqLWTQCeHM

Their policy is, you get one warning. After that you get tossed with no refund.

As for Star Trek movies. You didn&#039;t like Kahn? I remember you coming with us to Undiscovered Country back in 1991 when Eastland had a theater. We enjoyed that, especially after the stinkburger Final Frontier was.

Sadly, I just couldn&#039;t like this new one. It was Star Trek for retards because Abrams found the backstory a burden for his explosions and other contrived plot devices. I know it&#039;s just fiction but even fiction has boundaries, rules and expectations. Here this was more of Hollywood&#039;s sexing it up and agism: would it kill them to make Kirk the captain at 34 as opposed to a young turk in his 20s? I certainly wouldn&#039;t put the real USS Enterprise in the hands of a guy in his 20s fresh out of Annapolis and I don&#039;t care if his name is John McCain IV.

In the end, it was just a movie. I can only hope Star Trek continues to follow its past path. The odd numbered ones (this would be XI) suck and you have to wait for an even-numbered movie (II, IV, VI and VIII), with X being the only exception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lester,</p>
<p>Amen to magpies! You should come to Austin, sit through a movie at Alamo Drafthouse which is for diehards. When it&#8217;s a big-deal movie such as Star Trek or Watchmen, they show a little comical warning that ends with a message: &#8220;Don&#8217;t talk during the movie or we&#8217;ll throw your ass out!&#8221;</p>
<p>A favorite of mine is here: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUqLWTQCeHM" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUqLWTQCeHM&amp;referer=');">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUqLWTQCeHM</a></p>
<p>Their policy is, you get one warning. After that you get tossed with no refund.</p>
<p>As for Star Trek movies. You didn&#8217;t like Kahn? I remember you coming with us to Undiscovered Country back in 1991 when Eastland had a theater. We enjoyed that, especially after the stinkburger Final Frontier was.</p>
<p>Sadly, I just couldn&#8217;t like this new one. It was Star Trek for retards because Abrams found the backstory a burden for his explosions and other contrived plot devices. I know it&#8217;s just fiction but even fiction has boundaries, rules and expectations. Here this was more of Hollywood&#8217;s sexing it up and agism: would it kill them to make Kirk the captain at 34 as opposed to a young turk in his 20s? I certainly wouldn&#8217;t put the real USS Enterprise in the hands of a guy in his 20s fresh out of Annapolis and I don&#8217;t care if his name is John McCain IV.</p>
<p>In the end, it was just a movie. I can only hope Star Trek continues to follow its past path. The odd numbered ones (this would be XI) suck and you have to wait for an even-numbered movie (II, IV, VI and VIII), with X being the only exception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

