I readily admit how tight Apple is with the keys to the kingdom unlike Microsoft (hence, the “I Love You Virus”). However, I have no idea why Apple is tight with BlueTooth, it certainly isn’t money because Apple got out of the peripheral business (printers, scanners, etc) years ago. It could be something like tethering which isn’t Apple’s fault but AT&T. Personally, if it isn’t a Wii or PS3 device, Bluetooth is rather lame.

As for the restrictions about iTunes, where have you been? The DRM ended earlier this year so there is no more restrictions on burning, etc. Again, the RIAA PR machine worked its magic on you making you think it was an Apple decision to have DRM, it wasn’t. Think about it. If Apple loved DRM and only wanted iTunes Store-based content on your iPod, then you wouldn’t be able to rip your own CDs you paid for to have sync’d to the device or free podcasts. I’m a huge music lover. My collection now exceeds 2300 CDs so I’ve never depended on the iTunes Store to fill the five iPods I’ve owned over the years (I’ve always managed to sell them used).

You say Apple sells to emotions. That sounds like Microsoft Sour Grapes™ 7 (better than Vista). All I know is the proof being in the usage. I get more accomplished with my Mac than I ever could with a PC. When I worked at University Towers, the hours put into maintaining two 486s was more than eight Macs. I’m way past the emotion like the GDW Days, I’m 40 now, I need results not commercials with people getting bribes in a parking lot or a guy in a shark tank saying he’s a PC. If there’s an emotion involved, it’s more often coming from the Anti-Mac crowd. My favorite one is the Ubuntu diehard who goes on about how easy it is to use. . .…if you’re a 17-year-old kid with all the time in the world to read support forums. I wonder which OS he uses when his Ubuntu is down?

Just the next time you need an Apple product, write me. I can’t make you love it 100% but I can save you at least 15% so then I’ll be satisfied if you love the difference!

I suspected this post might bring you out. Thanks for the comment. :-)

Re “Apple bashing,” I’d say the first four paragraphs are glowing praise! My spouse loves her Touch. I’m jealous. Wish I had one, but the fancy show horse just won’t plow like I need it to.

Re the OS upgrade cost, I figure the bluetooth shouldn’t have been disabled in the first place. That’s my point about the locked trunk.

Re buying accessories, note that I already own the earphones (and keyboard) for my Ipaq; just hoped to use it (them) with the Touch. And I’m still disappointed that no bluetooth mic is supported by the hardware and/or OS.

I am platform-agnostic, by the way. Which tends to mean that Windows lovers think I hate Windows and Mac lovers think I hate Mac. (And Linux lovers suspect I secretly love Linux.)

Re “business,” let me put it this way: Apple sells itself to the emotions. No one else makes products that look as good, feel as good, or operate as smoothly. Apple is the hip, ergonomic side of the Force.

But when you sell to perception like that, you gotta expect me to feel frustration that the only way to have a mic is to buy an iPhone. I don’t want an iPhone. I don’t want its calling plan.

There are other such Mac practices I’ve come up against that have built an overall perception of “If you want to make that work, it’ll cost you extra.” Off the top of my head: The MobileMe charge; the old .Mac account charge; the four-copy limit on iTunes; the fact that in an office of 20 networked Macs, sometimes I can listen to another person’s music, and sometimes I hit a song that isn’t “authorized” on my computer.

These are all things I expect from Microsoft, because they never said they’re anything but business.

But I *feel* like Mac offers to be my friend. Then it slaps the back of my head when I’m not looking.

In any event, I’d LOVE the Touch to be my new PDA. But without the working features I need, it’s just another expensive toy, and I’ve run out of pockets.

A little fact-checking might help you with your Apple-bashing. Then again, why not, picking on Microsoft is too easy and tiresome like Michael Jackson’s funeral coverage.

The OS update would’ve been free as they used to be but due to Sarbanes-Oxley, nobody can supply customers permanent modifications without collecting money. iPhone users get it because they’re paying AT&T every month. It isn’t Apple’s decision, it’s the law now. You’d get the result with a Blackberry.

You could’ve asked me regarding the accessories or did some homework before buying those things, an Apple Store is a good start. Heck, I can get you a discount.

To continue with your automobile analogy, you’re blaming the car maker for a repair/modification made at the local oil change chain which isn’t in the specifications.

Apple’s products are not perfect neither, my job would certainly be much easier if they were (I’d still have tons of work due to misperceptions) but they’re still ahead of the curve. Hence, all the knock-offs: Palm Pre, Sansa, Zune, etc.

I am curious as to your further definition of “serious business” and a “more mature relationship” when it comes to computers and MP3 players in a friendly, spirited debate. I know this post will be seen as defensive by those who hate Apple, etc. However, I would like to set the record straight because I recall your frequent griping about Macs at GDW.

I for one will stick with my “dancing clown” product over the alternative: a game station that collects viruses and has word-processing kludge’d in.